NOTES IN GENERAL: Say something wrong, lose 1 point. Example GPL isn't
viral. IPv6 uses 64 bits. YouTube is liable for copyright infringement
(there is a pending court case, but safe-harbor has prevailed so far)


Problem 1:

For a 2: network of networks
For a 3: network of autonomous systems (AS) or something that gets at
that, could be how run, governed, etc.

Here's a 1: network infrastructure that hooks up computers across
the world to each other for the purpose of sharing data, information,
and applications

Why a 1? no network of networks. The internet doesn't have a purpose,
per se.

-1 WRITE TOO MUCH. The prompt says one or two sentences.

--
Problem 2

For a 2, mention 32 and 128 bit, mention 4 billion vs. limitless or
close to that.

For a 3, mention why government is interested in this: any good reason
can earn the 3

For a 1:  failure to mention 32/128 or just too little

For a 1: No gov't (so 2 max) and don't do 2^128 or tons or something
to explain vast change with 2 and 128. Or use 64, that's wrong.


----
Problem 3

+1 convey what open source is to some degree
 code available, free to use, GPL must be viral

+1 talk about open source in context of monolopy: MAKE A CONNECTION
+1 open source software can compete by definition, so how to have
a monopoly? Most will get +2 for the latter two, but if they miss "in
the context" and just tag it on at the end, they'll get just 1/3

-NOTE: If there's just a list of what open source is, that's likely +1,
they don't get the +2 at the bottom because there's no connection. Avoid
awarding Brain-Dumps lots of points.

----
Problem 4
****
+1, say proprietary with a semblance of a reason that you can live with,
    else 0 for bad reason.Can't see this, but possible

+2 say IETF creates open standards with something about 
anyone can participate, not a company, loose, etc.

For the last +1, see more "rough consensus", "it's fair", a little
more than the basic IETF open to anyone.

----
Problem 5

+1 ethical consideration
+1 legal consideration
+1 connect all this with non-profit, take-down alert, copyright law,
sparknote/cliff precedent -- something that makes it clear that
the student has connected ideas, e.g., DMCA, copyright automatic, etc.

Can lose one if claims wrong/weak, e.g., "professors should have the
right to prohibit notes taken on their lectures from being given to
the public"