CPS 108, Spring 2004, OOGA Evaluations

Your individual evaluation and assessment of your OOGA project will count for 3% of your OOGA grade. This means that if your group gets a 90% on everything else (preliminary submissions, final code, and architecture) your grade will be 90% if your individual assessment is thoughtful and complete. If you don't do the assessment at all your final grade will be 87%.

For full credit your assessment and evaluation must appear to have taken serious thought and effort. The assessment should be 1-2 pages in length. You should include the following information.

Assessments/Evaluations that show particular care and attention can earn up to 2% extra on the final OOGA grade.

Evaluations are due at 10:00 pm Tuesday or before your group meeting, whichever is later.

  1. Your assessment of the group's final achievement. Did you fall short of expectations? Did you exceed your initial predictions? How well did you work together? What areas could have been improved? Were group roles and responsibilities clearly defined?

  2. Using this project as a baseline, what could you/should you do next time? What experiences, good and/or bad, helped you learn about group work. How can you use these experiences to improve on your next group project?

  3. What are the positive/negative aspects of OOGA as a final project? What technologies and/or programming concepts would you like to see be a part of a 108 final project that were missing? What were the positive aspects of this project, if any?

  4. Individual Assessment: what were your contributions in terms of code, design, group moral, etc. Specifically, what did you do for the group and for yourself? What aspects, if any, of your effort and and work are you most proud of? What aspects, if any, are most in need of improvement? What do you think your fellow teammembers will say about your achievements and efforts?

  5. Assessment of Individuals: for each group member, evaluate performance, effort, accomplishments on a scale of 1-5 where 1 is "met them once, I think, they weren't around" and 5 is "captain, CEO, chief-architect, cheer-leader, all around good person and the project would have been significantly less without them". It's possible that everyone in the group could get a 5, or that everyone could get a 1. Please be sure to justify, briefly, your assessment/evaluation. Be sure to assess/evaluate yourself too.

Please name your assessment README, include your name in the README file and submit as shown below. 

  submit_cps108 oogaeval README
Owen L. Astrachan
Last modified: Sun Apr 25 23:15:55 EDT 2004