Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Huned M. Botee <huned.botee@duke.edu>
To :
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 03:45:58 +0000
Re: lab reference
Tim Bain wrote:
> I've got a similar question... Is it acceptably object-oreinted/
> encapsulated/whatever to have a large switch statement to
> determine which operator/function/variable should be called
> and then add the appropriate node to the expression tree?
> Or is there a different, better way we should be attacking
> the problem?
First, read the above. Second, note that I would STRONGLY suggest
AGAINST doing it.
In class, Professor Duvall demonstrated how such a switch statement
could be eliminated by a carefully thought out inheritance hierarchy.
Please see the expression tree demo code.
So, to directly answer your question: it's not really acceptable.
Good luck, etc.
huned
Huned M. Botee, UTAesque
huned.botee@duke.edu
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]